Arrest record christal mccollim

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan C Hugo on behalf of Nancy Berryhill. Attorney(s) appearing: Megan C. Hugo (Hugo, Megan)
January 22, 2019 Filing 10 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 1/16/2019. (blr)
January 18, 2019 Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/16/2019. (blr)
January 11, 2019 Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due April 22, 2019; Defendant's response due June 3, 2019; Plaintiff's reply due June 17, 2019. (cc: all counsel) (blr)
January 10, 2019 Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 1/10/2019. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge David E Jones for all further proceedings. Judge J P Stadtmueller no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(jm)
January 10, 2019 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nancy Berryhill. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
January 10, 2019 Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
January 8, 2019 Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 1/8/2019 GRANTING #3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (jm)
December 31, 2018 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Christal Mccollim. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Drexler-Dreis, Leah)
December 27, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Christal Mccollim. (Drexler-Dreis, Leah)
December 27, 2018 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Christal Mccollim. (Drexler-Dreis, Leah)
December 27, 2018 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Christal Mccollim (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Drexler-Dreis, Leah)
December 27, 2018 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mccollim v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christal Mccollim
Represented By: Leah A Drexler-Dreis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Megan C Hugo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.